A UMass research on video gaming attitudes and behaviors is believed to be the largest in US history.
Gambling is an topic that is important Massachusetts at the moment, as the state prepares for the coming of at least two large resort casinos next few years.
The University of Massachusetts at Amherst (UMass Amherst) has released a study that gives a baseline for the state of gambling in the state now, one that can then be used to track changes in long term studies in advance of that gaming expansion.
The research, which comes from the School of Public Health and Health Sciences at UMass Amherst, surveyed almost 10,000 Massachusetts residents.
That’s enough to help make it the gambling study that is largest ever completed in the United States.
Survey Establishes Baseline for Future Studies
The study had been praised by Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Steve Crosby, who said planet 7 oz bonus codes june 2018 so it should provide an objective way to understand the way the state will be influenced by gambling going ahead.
‘The most important point is that we are establishing standard conditions for every socio and economic variable that could be affected by the introduction of casinos,’ Crosby said. ‘Our researchers will then track changes in those variables throughout the life time of the casinos in order to know to a certainty the effects also to inform data-driven mitigation strategies for almost any potential negative consequences.’
The survey was conducted between September 2013 and May 2014, with state residents being selected at random to complete the questionnaire.
The result was a wide range of information detailing precisely how people in Massachusetts gamble and view various forms of gaming.
For example, it turns out that about 72 per cent of respondents reported gambling at least one time over the previous year.
Most Massachusetts residents (about 60 %) stated they played the lottery, while 22 per cent reported that they’d gone to a casino during the year that is past.
Residents Like Casinos, But Not Locally
One topic that is hot the region has been how Massachusetts’ brand new casinos will impact existing casino operations in Connecticut. The study suggests that officials in Connecticut are directly to worry: 65 percent of the Massachusetts residents who went to casinos visited resorts in Connecticut, a portion which should go way down once the Wynn Everett and MGM Springfield are operational.
The study also looked at exactly how residents experience the state’s gambling expansion, which includes a slots parlor or over to three full-scale casinos. The answer was the one that was heard in many communities through the entire state: not in my own backyard.
A strong 59 % most of adults in Massachusetts said which they think gambling expansion will either have neutral impact or be useful to the state.
Nevertheless, 46 percent believe that gambling expansion is harmful within their very own community, while only 28 percent trust casino expansion would be useful locally.
The study additionally discovered that illegal gambling ended up being fairly common in Massachusetts. About 13 percent of residents had bet on sports in the year that is past while two percent reporting gambling on unregulated online gaming web sites.
More analysis that is in-depth of data collected is expected to be released into the months to come. However, major investigator Rachel Volberg claims that the actual value in this survey ended up being collecting information before viewpoints could be shaped by the introduction of casinos.
‘Not many people realize exactly how uncommon it really is for a problem survey that is gambling be completed before some brand new type of gambling becomes available,’ Volberg said. ‘The Commonwealth is lucky that both the Expanded Gaming Act and the Massachusetts Gaming Commission therefore clearly and forcefully supported such an effort and I am excited to share our findings before any casinos begin operations in our state.’
Interpol Disbands €20 Million Anti-Match-Fixing Relationship With FIFA
FIFA President Sepp Blatter (right) and then Secretary General of Interpol, Ronald Noble, seal the deal. Interpol has now concluded that FIFA doesn’t share the essential values for the statutory police force community.’ No shit! (Image: cnn.com)
Interpol has frozen a €20 ($22.5 million) donation, paid to it by FIFA, to fund a joint program that is anti-match-fixing.
The integrity that is 10-year Sport initiative was designed to stamp out fixed games orchestrated by criminal betting syndicates, but Interpol said this week that the FIFA corruption scandal had made the relationship untenable.
‘In light of the current context surrounding FIFA, while Interpol is still committed to developing our Integrity in Sport program, I have decided to suspend the agreement,’ said Interpol Secretary General Jürgen Stock. ‘ All outside partners, whether public or private, must share the fundamental values and principles of the company, also as those of the wider law enforcement community.’
The terms and conditions of this deal, signed last year, state that that FIFA must remain ‘compatible aided by the axioms, aims and activities of Interpol,’ but, following arrest of seven FIFA officials as the result of a massive FBI corruption probe, Interpol may be forgiven for feeling that the soccer regulating human anatomy has not held up its end of the bargain.
It begs the question, though, why ended up being Interpol, having its wide-reaching access to an expansive network of law enforcement agencies, not aware of FIFA corruption in 2011?
The press that is british crying foul as far back as 2006. This was the year that journalist Andrew Jennings published Foul! The Secret World of FIFA: Bribes, Vote-Rigging and Ticket Scandals. It is said by the name all.
Also in 2006, Panorama, a BBC affairs that are current, broadcast a documentary asserting that Sepp Blatter had been investigated by Swiss police for attempting to wallpaper more than a FIFA bribery scandal.
Inside it, Lord Triesman, the previous chairman of the English Football Association, described FIFA being an organization that ‘behaves like a mafia family’,
A follow-up Panorama documentary in 2010 accused Issa Hayatou, Vice President of FIFA, of taking bribes. He threatened to sue the BBC, but he did not.
Interpol’s willingness to bury its head in the sand might have been more about the fact that the €20 million FIFA paid to the law that is international agency constituted more than 25 % of its yearly budget.
Finally, though, with FIFA exposed and indicted by the usa, the only country that dared to keep the organization to task, it had been too much, or to embarrassing, for Interpol to stomach.
For a lighter note, the FIFA communications director Walter De Gregorio cracked a ‘joke’ about his employers on Swiss television this week, and believe us, it’s a zinger!
‘ The FIFA president, secretary general and communications director are all traveling in a car,’ grinned De Gregorio.
‘But who’s driving?’ he quizzed.
‘The authorities,’ he zinged.
Briefly afterwards FIFA announced that De Gregorio had selected to ‘relinquish his office.’
Ritz Club Sues Tycoon Safa Abdulla Al Geabury Over £2 million Gambling Debt.
Safa Abdulla Al Geabury, whose £2 million check that is dud when Ritz staff tried to cash it the day after their gambling spree. (Image: standard.co.uk)
The Ritz Club, London’s famously high-end, high-roller casino, is suing A swiss home tycoon over a £2 million ($3.1 million) bounced check.
According to the Ritz’s filing, Safa Abdulla Al Geabury penned out the check to invest in a gambling session one night in February last year, but it turned into a dud when the casino tried to bank it the morning that is following.
The Ritz can be searching for an£ that is extra ($310,000) in accumulated interest on your debt.
It has been reported that the casino, which is owned by reclusive billionaire twins that are identical Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay, has been plunged into the red with a series of unpaid gambling debts, forcing it to pursue its debtors aggressively into the courts.
According to the London Evening Standard, the casino has litigated against 10 high rollers in the year that is last in an effort to recoup 2013 losses of £12.5 million ($19.4 million).
Al Geabury’s protection is he is a gambling addict and their staff should have understood this and stopped him from playing.
He wishes the debts written off, but he’s on shaky ground with this line; in 2014 the casino won an identical tall Court battle against Noora Al-Daher, the wife for the Omani minister that is foreign.
The Ritz sued Al-Daher after she had checked out the casino in April 2012 and proceeded to lose £2 million ($3.3 million) in a few hours. Al-Daher failed to honor £1 million ($1.65) of her financial obligation. She promptly counter-sued the casino, claiming that the casino had taken advantage of her.
Al-Daher had claimed in court that Ritz Club employees encouraged her to continue playing a game title of chemin-de-fer, despite having been made conscious of her gambling addiction, and also allowed her to cash checks, which she claimed was unlawful.
She also said that the casino was in fact under a ‘duty of care’ towards her, a responsibility which it had neglected to fulfill.
But, the court heard that Al-Daher and her family had apparently happily gambled away $5 million in Las Vegas a few months after her visit towards the Ritz.
In governing in favor of the casino, the judge said he was certain that, had Al-Daher been refused permission to carry on gambling at the Ritz, she ‘would have now been eager and inclined to gamble at other casinos thereafter, and really probably during her stay in London during the days or weeks after 3 April 2012.’
The judge into the Al Geabury case, Mrs Justice Simler, meanwhile, said at a hearing that is preliminary psychiatric reports have been commissioned to assess Al Geabury’s state of brain regarding the time he lost the money and whether he was in charge of their actions.
‘The essence is whether Mr Al Geabury includes a gambling addiction and also the claimant’s knowledge of that,’ she said.