Milford, Massachusetts Voters Reject Foxwoods Casino Proposal

Milford, Massachusetts Voters Reject Foxwoods Casino Proposal

These Milford, Massachusetts anti-Foxwoods Casino protesters carried the day whenever project was defeated by voters recently (Image supply: AP Photo/Steven Senne)

Sorry, Foxwoods: it seems you’re not wanted in Massachusetts, either. The Connecticut gambling giant ended up being soundly defeated at the polls this week, as voters in the town of Milford, Massachusetts decided which they didn’t want a casino resort in their backyards.

Three Down for the (Voter) Count

This is now a story that is routine Massachusetts, where voters rejected proposals in East Boston and Palmer earlier this thirty days. In this case, Foxwoods ended up being looking to build a $1 billion complex in the town that is boston-area compete for that region’s sole casino license.

As soon as the returns that are first coming in, it absolutely was clear that the casino vote was not going to go Foxwoods’ way. CEO Scott Butera quickly conceded defeat after the polls closed, telling casino supporters that the vote meant that plans for the casino would absolutely not be going forward. Once all the votes had been in, the margin was enormous: 6,361 against the plan, and 3,480 for it, or around a 65%-35% split.

Foxwoods spent a large sum of money marketing the casino, but it had beenn’t enough to convince locals it was a deal that is good the local economy, apparently. As they promoted the fact that there is numerous new jobs created and more than $30 million in new income for the town, the opposition carried the day.

‘Our city wasn’t for sale,’ stated John Seaver of the group that is anti-casino Milford. ‘They wanted to come in and call the shots, and they almost did. However the people rose up, pushed back and overwhelmingly stated ‘this town isn’t for purchase.”

Opponents warned that adding a casino resort could increase crime into the town, along with depress property values. That, along side warnings of massive traffic jams, was seemingly enough to convince most Milford residents to vote ‘no’.

According to Butera, though, the real problem is that myths about casino gambling are influencing voters, more than arguments in favor of building the resorts.

‘I think individuals are afraid regarding the unknown,’ Butera stated. ‘There’s plenty of myths in what casinos are…they are not these crazy places that are hedonistic. They truly are actually very resorts that are nice have actually much more to do [than] just games.’

The Milford vote was the last one scheduled at least for the right time being among a series of binding referendums held by towns over whether they would approve gambling enterprises integrated their towns. Applications can still come in for the three casino licenses and the one slot parlor license in the state until the end of the year, nevertheless.

Whilst the results that are recent casino businesses have been poor in these votes, other businesses experienced more success. Both Wynn Resorts and MGM have successfully had projects approved by their local communities, permitting them to compete for licenses in the Greater Boston Area and Western Massachusetts, respectively. Three towns have supported plans to build smaller slots parlors in their communities, though only one will ultimately get a license from the state.

Other projects still hang in the balance. Mohegan Sun narrowly lost a vote to accept a casino in Palmer so narrowly, in reality, that they are getting a official recount associated with the results later on this month. Meanwhile, Suffolk Downs in East Boston is thinking about the chance for changing their plan and placing the entirety of these casino resort in neighboring Revere, which voted in favor of allowing them to build there.

New Jersey Online Gambling Soft Establish Isn’t Without Glitches

The latest Jersey on-line casino soft launch has not been without some snafus. Which will be why, ahem, you do soft launches.

New Jersey’s soft launch of these online gambling platform was, for the most part, a success. The games work, the sites are up and running, as well as the verification systems are doing their job. In fact, the only real issue is that those systems were working a little way too hard, as quite a couple of residents had trouble proving they were really in New Jersey.

We Have Launch…Sort Of

On Nov. 21, the soft launch for the first round of web gambling sites went live for players located in New Jersey. During the soft launch which is made to weed any bugs out and ensure things were working as planned only about 500 players were permitted on each site. Still, real money play was available, making this the first time state-regulated on line gambling had taken place in New Jersey.

Seven casinos were approved to run websites at the right time of the launch. They included the Borgata, Trump Plaza, the Taj Mahal, the Golden Nugget, Tropicana, Bally’s, and Caesars Atlantic City. Combined, those sites could actually run 14 gambling websites, including a mixture of both casino and poker that is online.

Assuming all goes well in this soft launch period which expands to the ‘real’ launch date of Nov. 26 online gambling will be available to all or any residents in nj-new jersey avove the age of 21 starting early next week. But according to some customers, there are positively kinks in the operational system that still need to be ironed out.

As we reported earlier, the most common problem so far was also the one that was the most predictable. Numerous people had trouble logging into the sites due to the known reality that either the geolocation software getting used couldn’t be certain they were in New Jersey, or they weren’t immediately in a position to meet other verification standards in order to prove their residency.

Inaccessible

For instance, some players tried logging in from different locations and still couldn’t look for a method to access any associated with the web sites. New Jersey resident Joseph Brennen reportedly attempted to log in from a McDonald’s in Atlantic City, but was told by various web sites that they couldn’t tell where he was located, or that they didn’t think he was in New Jersey. Then he tried driving inland and north about five miles, but still could not have the sites to recognize he was in the state.

Driving another ten miles inland and attempting to connect from a restaurant additionally failed to produce any results. While some associated with sites now allowed him to register accounts, they nevertheless desired some proof residency such as for example a computer program bill which he couldn’t straight away provide.

And Brennen wasn’t the just one who went into such problems.

‘I made a small deposit, nevertheless when I tried to play they said I wasn’t in New Jersey,’ said Tina Gonzalez, who possessed a long call with customer care and saw her computer crash while trying to create up a merchant account on Caesars’ website. ‘I’m afraid that whenever they try to repeat this statewide regarding the 26th, it is going to be mayhem.’

The inability to prove one’s location seemed to be more widespread while few people reported those kinds of technical problems. While many industry professionals predicted some people would get locked from the sites because of being very near to the latest Jersey edge, it is unclear why this was occurring just as much as 10 to 15 miles away from the state’s edges as well.

Hopefully, these issues are circumvented by the launch that is hard to come.

‘ The opening that is soft be used to show the division that most systems perform as required underneath the stress of real time gaming and that operational and revenue reporting controls work well. Staff will continually gauge the progress of each and every platform provider before allowing them to start gaming to the public that is general November 26,’ said DGE Director David Rebuck in a statement.

London’s Hippodrome Brings in Door Dwarves Amidst Controversy

casino winner red deer

Well-known little person and star Peter Dinklage is unlikely to be applying at the Hippodrome (Image source: Frazer Harrison/Getty Images)

In a controversial move that could be regarded as exploitative or helpful depending on your viewpoint who owns the Hippodrome, the casino that is largest in great britain , has put out an ad to allow the planet know he is looking to hire little individuals as ‘door dwarves’ at the venue for the breaks.

Risking being called a circus carney, the owner advertised for the roles in the widely read Metro newspaper, stating that the casino is looking to ‘create a team of Britain’s tiniest bouncers Door Dwarves for the entrance that is new in Street.’

Owner Claims Success

Based on reports, trials of this initiative, which would introduce a force of men and women 4 foot 10 inches or smaller to man the entrance to the casino, were thought to have gone ‘fantastically’ well, and also as a result, the management at the location has been convinced to introduce the system on a full-time basis.

CEO and chairman of the casino Simon Thomas, trying to justify the scheme, explained to the news that the machine was simply the latest in a line that is long of employment opportunities during the Leicester Square casino.

‘The Hippodrome is A london that is phenomenal institution. It opened in 1900 as a circus that is indoor individuals like Little Titch regarding the cast,’ explained Thomas, incorporating that legendary P.T. Barnum had circus performer and small individual Tom Thumb perform at the location back in the time.

‘We had high-diving dwarves who dived through the mistrals’ gallery 60-feet up into a water tank,’ he included. ‘So they have been very much part of the history associated with place.’

How charming can you get. It is like Cirque du Soleil, nevertheless the shortstuff version.

Interesting Logic

Since bouncers are typically very large, wide and menacing-looking figures, whom the common Joe would rather not to ever get a cross, hiring a team of smaller personnel does appear just like a strange move for the casino if they’re trying to deter the riff-raff from causing trouble during the site.

‘Nobody messes with a dwarf, so in ways, they truly are very doorman that is good’ argued Thomas. ‘They can manage people a lot better than having a human eclipse on the door as a number of the clubs do in London. No one is going to select on someone who is below-average height. It’s not quite a macho thing to do, so it is an excellent way of controlling the entranceway.

‘ There isn’t any discrimination at all,’ claimed Thomas, building up to borrow possibly the most over-used phrase for the twenty-first century to dispute complaints that the location might be poking fun at little people. ‘I find we are now living in a world of political correctness gone mad.’

But whenever we are to simply take the opinion that the task role isn’t poking enjoyable at little people, should we possibly take the viewpoint it is, at the least, exploiting them? Thomas himself stated that the initiative is ‘building on the rich heritage of innovative activity’ so clearly it is not just their unintimidating stature which he wishes to utilize.

‘I have always been wanting to run a very entertaining that is large and I have a lot of different people who have lots of different skills,’ explained the Hippodrome chairman. ‘we have actually chosen those skills and physical attributes that are appropriate to that work. They have been highly expert and have got to get on with it.’