Massachusetts Gaming Commission Allows for Delayed Revere Vote

Massachusetts Gaming Commission Allows for Delayed Revere Vote

A rendering that is 3-D of proposed Suffolk Downs casino, now planned for Revere with partner Mohegan Sun (Image: Wendy Maeda/Boston Globe)

They do say the house constantly wins, and right now, prospective casino operators Suffolk Downs and Mohegan Sun are definitely on a winning streak in Massachusetts. The Massachusetts Gaming Commission unanimously authorized a waiver to the standing deadline for operators to register applications including certified referendum results from their host communities by the end of the season.

More Time, The Following Year

That December 31 deadline had been going to be a problem that is real the Suffolk Downs casino proposal. While the gaming payment had been willing to let the competition track and partner Mohegan Sun the opportunity to build a casino solely on land in the city of Revere, it also agreed that the original vote taken early in the day this present year was for the considerably different proposal. As such, a new vote was needed one which would not have the ability to be held prior to the year-end deadline.

Your choice was one which the panel said they made in a attempt to be since fair as possible to all sides. On November 5, both East Boston and Revere voted on whether to accept a Suffolk Downs casino that would have been primarily and very nearly entirely situated on the Boston side of the edge involving the two communities. East Boston residents voted against that proposal, while Revere voters overwhelmingly approved it.

That left a whole lot of outstanding questions that are legal probably the most important of that was whether Suffolk Downs could now build a casino solely on land in Revere, which had approved a casino. The decisions since that time have essentially stated that the clear answer is ‘yes’ but that it’s going to be treated as a unique project that has to be re-approved, separately from the previous proposal.

‘We have wrestled hard with racking your brains on just how to reconcile the ‘no’ vote in East Boston aided by the ‘yes’ vote in Revere, and there is no solution that is perfect’ said Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Stephen Crosby.

The waiver was the closest to that ‘perfect solution’ that the commission could show up with, thinking about the tight due date. Mohegan Sun must still file their application being a prospective operator by the end of 2013, but a 2nd referendum in Revere will simply take destination sometime within the next 90 days after the original deadline.

Boston Fires Back

Boston officials opposed the waiver, saying that the vote in East Boston should be ‘respected and maintained’ in a letter to the payment. In addition, incoming Boston Mayor-elect Martin Walsh has said that he’s gotn’t yet ruled out the possibility of taking action that is legal this second casino proposal in Revere.

But Revere Mayor Dan Rizzo has expressed confidence that the residents of his town will not only get to vote regarding the brand new casino proposal, but that they can back it using the same kind of support they did the initial time around. On November 5, 61 percent of Revere voters decided to endorse the Suffolk Downs casino proposal, though it is not clear if that help will increase or fall given that the casino will actually be in Revere.

Should the new proposal gain approval from voters and regulators, it will become the second project to compete for the one available eastern Massachusetts casino permit. One other casino proposal for the reason that region is situated in Everett, and would be operated by Wynn Resorts. That project just passed the suitability quotient regarding the gaming commission’s investigations.

Polish Computer Programmers Sentenced for Cyber Blackmail Threats

They could look happy and carefree here, but Polish computer programmers Patryk Surmacki, 35 (left) and Piotr Smirnow, 31 (right) meant no good if they authorized attacks that are cyber two casino sites (Image: Cavendish Press)

Two Polish computer programmers who attempted to blackmail two major unnamed on-line casino sites one in the united kingdom and one in the us have actually now been sentenced to jail, after a police sting nabbed the pair earlier this year.

False Pretenses

Piotr Smirnow, 31, and Patryk Surmacki, 35, approached the owner of the united kingdom site and requested a meeting. The victim who owns A manchester-based internet casino later met the pair under the understanding that Smirnow possessed a business proposition for him. The pair had been known by him for four years before the proposed business meeting, according to authorities reports.

But things took an ugly change when, during the meeting which took place at Heathrow Airport’s Terminal 5 the computer code writers demanded a 50 per cent share associated with man’s company and threatened to take the casino site down’s servers if he declined.

The pair told the owner that they knew a notorious computer hacker by the name of ‘Wapo’ into the U.S., who they claimed would carry the cyber-attack out on the business’s servers if the pair paid him to do this, thereby stopping the operations of the company.

Known being a ‘distributed denial of service’ (DDoS), the court was told that the attack is effective at bringing down also the many advanced of websites by overwhelming them via a mass attack of the company’s computer servers.

Cyber Hacker Paid Off

As the business owner refused to hand over 50 percent of their company, Smirnow and Surmacki carried out their threat on August 2nd and paid the American that is cloaked hacker;12,000 ($19,700) to do their dirty work. The Manchester-based site went down for five hours, costing business £15,000 ($24,558) when no clients could access your website during that time.

The victim had already alerted Manchester police to the duo’s danger, however, and another meeting was set up in a bugged hotel room next to Heathrow Airport on August 7th.

Whenever the dog owner of the business told the pair that he would not cooperate using them, they told him which they were ‘going to war’ and were then arrested by police who have been on standby.

Smirnow also admitted around anymore,’ leading Detective Inspector Mossop to the knowing that the research had disassembled an ’emerging global cyber danger. which he had carried out the same attack for an US victim through a Skype call, during which he stated which they had ‘enough power so people can’t try to push us’ This time the victim was a U.S.-based gaming platform that allows 100 casino sites worldwide.

As for the U.S. site owners, they obviously dodged a bullet.

‘This case made me fear for my individual security, since well as for the future of my business. Which explains why I felt compelled to do this against the perpetrators,’ said who owns the Manchester-based casino site, which is calculated to be worth £30 million ($49,143,000). It is projected that a week-long attack on this business might have cost the site owner a $600,000 loss, based on court reports.

‘No one should have to succumb to blackmail and this sentence should become a warning to those associated with cyber extortion that the police and the courts will see this sort of conduct very seriously,’ the site owner added.

Smirnow and Surmacki later pleaded bad to two charges of blackmail and unauthorized functions on computers, and had been sentenced to 5 years and four months each by Judge Michael Henshaw at the Manchester court. Their own defense team described their attempted blackmail as ‘bizarre, misconceived, naïve and brazen.’

‘They utilized their intimate, expert knowledge of online business to bully the victims into submission,’ revealed Detective Inspector Chris Mossop for the Organised Crime that is serious Division. ‘ But make no blunder, they may are using the latest technology, but this ended up being just good antique blackmail.’

Affinity Gaming Hit with Target-Style Security Breach

Nevada and casino that is regional Affinity Gaming is struck with a credit and debit card protection breach.

It is maybe not been a week that is good the industry that supposedly safeguards our credit and debit card transactions. Just days after a national scandal that pulled within the Secret Service to investigate a huge system hack at popular retailer Target a breach which could lead to fake charges, identity theft, or worse Las Vegas-based casino business Affinity Gaming has been hit with a similar fiasco.

Credit-Processing Techniques Compromised

Affinity announced that their credit and debit-processing systems had been hacked by the weekend’s start, and were telling their customers most likely close to 300,000 of who could have been hit by the hacking to watch their credit info as well as any unauthorized charges to their accounts.

Exactly what everyone wants to worry about after blowing their holiday bankroll, right?

But wait, it gets far worse. All the way through to October 16: that’s seven months while Target’s breach spanned approximately five weeks from around Thanksgiving to a week before Christmas Affinity says theirs hit all 12 of their properties in four U.S. states, and that the breach continued unabated from March 14 of this year. Included in the properties affected were the business’s popular Nevada stateline casinos, including Whiskey Pete’s, Buffalo Bill’s, and Primm Valley Resort and Casino.

According to outside legal counsel for Affinity, James Prendergast, the cyber-hack ended up being from a ‘very sophisticated piece of malware that got as a location that is terrible. It got contained and eliminated and we called in third-party investigators that are forensic confirmation that it was gone,’ Prendergast noted.

No Way to Know Who Got Hit

Adding to the confusion, because Affinity doesn’t store any client charge card information in their databases, they do not have means of knowing or notifying whom might have been suffering from the web theft. However with casinos scattered throughout Nevada, Colorado, Missouri and Iowa, it most likely could impact a nearly nationwide consumer base, particularly as several gambling enterprises have been in or near Las vegas, nevada.

And if you happened to pump gasoline at Affinity’s Primm Center petrol facility a significant stopping point at Nevada’s stateline into California you could also take difficulty, because that company’s credit and debit processing systems had been additionally hacked, starting on an as-yet-undetermined date and ending on November 29.

So far, the only method Affinity has been able to notify customers of any possible issues happens to be on their own site with a ‘public notice of information safety incident,’ but needless to say, many and also require been hit will not ever see that.

While hacking of the scope can fall under the purview for the Secret Service and also the FBI, both of whom happen notified, it undoubtedly gets the eye of state regulatory agencies, including Nevada’s Gaming Control Board. GCB Chairman A.G. Burnett states their organization let the Nevada Gaming Commission know of the dilemmas immediately.

‘The company promptly notified us of what happened,’ Burnett explained. ‘These are typically working together with us closely.’

As for Affinity, aside from their site notice and media attention, they don’t have plenty of methods to allow clients know what’s occurred or what you should do about this, but in a statement said that ‘Affinity regrets any inconvenience this incident might cause and has generated a confidential, toll-free inquiry line to assist its customers.’

That line, if you think you may have now been impacted, is open from 8 am to 6 pm Pacific Standard Time, Mondays through Fridays. The number to call for U.S. or Canadian residents is 877-238-2179; other international residents should call Affinity at +1-814-201-3696.

‘Affinity is cooperating in the ongoing law enforcement investigation regarding the incident,’ an organization statement read. ‘Affinity has additionally taken a number of measures to strengthen the security of our system and contains worked with legal and security vulnerability professionals to help identify and implement additional appropriate safeguards.’