Chauffer Suspect in Murder of Taiwanese Mogul Shih Chia-chin

Chauffer Suspect in Murder of Taiwanese Mogul Shih Chia-chin

Hsieh Yuan-hsin is the suspect that is main the kidnapping and murder of Shih Chia-chin. (Image: Taiwan police)

Taiwanese online gambling ringleader Shih Chia-chin may not be a household title in the online world betting community, but he had been infamous in his home nation for the wealth he attained by running their sites. Now, his kidnapping and murder have surprised the island nation. Shih’s body was discovered evening in Tainan County by police sunday. He was allegedly murdered after being kidnapped by his chauffeur and others that are several August 18.

Chauffeur Abducted Shih at Airport

On that time, Shih was picked up at the Taoyuan airport near Taiwan by their chauffeur, Hsieh Yuan-hsin. Just three hours later, the accountant at Shih’s business received a call saying that Shih had been demanding and kidnapped a ransom of TW$50 million ($1.67 million). Shih’s family attempted to negotiate with the kidnappers, eventually agreeing to wire TW$30 million ($1 million) to three separate bank accounts.

When the family nevertheless did not hear from Shih, they contacted the police for assistance later that day. Hsieh evidently made a try to withdraw the transferred ransom soon thereafter, but fled when he had been asked to provide identification during the bank.

Hsieh Flees to Thailand

Despite efforts from prosecutors whom issued a warrant to bar him from leaving the nation, Hsieh managed to board a flight to Thailand just hours later using a fake passport that used his photo but his cousin’s name and details. Hsieh was spotted on airport CCTV footage on 18 august.

Based on the United Daily Information, police noted that Hsieh didn’t have a criminal record, which made them suspect that another individual may have prepared the kidnapping. He did, but, appear to be covering his tracks, as he had used his real passport to book a trip to Hong Kong. The fake passport has been annulled, and Hsieh is suspected to be in Thailand. Nonetheless, authorities fear he could flee to Cambodia or Myanmar, and Thai police have been expected to assist within the investigation.

They also recommended that ransom might possibly not have been the motivation that is primary the crime. Hsieh fled the nation without recovering the ransom, and a watch that is valuable still on Shih’s body with regards to was discovered.

According to a report from the Central News Agency (CNA), a human anatomy was found in an area that is mountainous of County with more than 20 puncture wounds towards the back in the evening of August 24, about a week after the kidnapping took place. Shih’s family was called in to determine the body, and confirmed it was him.

Two Other Suspects in Custody

While Hsieh has not yet been apprehended, two other suspects were arrested on Monday. Full names were not available, but The China Post said that their surnames had been Lin and Cheng. According to police, Lin confessed to being fully a part of the kidnapping plot, but claimed that he did perhaps not know anything about plans to murder Shih. The two accomplices were identified making use of surveillance footage, which revealed they had abandoned Shih’s car in Greater Tainan.

Nine years ago, authorities cracked down on Shih’s online gambling ring. That led to an 18-month suspended jail term for the person whose fortune was apparently worth billions of New Taiwan Dollars. Reports say that Shih had been the victim of the kidnapping attempt four years early in the day.

PokerStars Should Wait to Enter US Markets, Says 888 CEO

888 CEO Brian Mattingley believes PokerStars ought to be allowed right back within the US, but should face a brief exclusionary period first. (Image: calvinayre.com)

PokerStars and 888 Poker are natural competitors, as the companies are two associated with biggest players in today’s on-line poker industry. PokerStars is by far the absolute most well-known Web poker site in the world these days, which may be why 888 CEO Brian Mattingley has previously said that letting the poker that is amaya-owned right back into the US would help all businesses, by attracting more players for everyone to share. But now, Mattingley has started walking straight back those comments a bit, at least when it comes to permitting PokerStars free entry into lucrative American states.

According to a meeting between Mattingley and Bluff Magazine‘s Steve Ruddock, the 888 CEO still believes that PokerStars is advantageous to the entire poker that is american, and claims he welcomes their return. However, he does think they should get at least a slap on the wrist before they’re let back in that they gained an unfair advantage by continuing to service players in the US after the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) went into effect, and that as a result.

Statement Appears to Contradict Earlier Stance

June this is a little different from comments published by the Las Vegas Review-Journal (LVRJ) is. In an interview with that paper’s Howard Stutz, Mattingley was quoted as saying that he wanted to back see pokerStars come to america just as possible.

‘It could be like unleashing a 800-pound gorilla into the market, but having more players for a regulated site would gain everyone,’ he said.

‘ We compete with PokerStars throughout Europe,’ Mattingley said of his biggest rival. ‘They are a competitor that is formidable. But they would make all of us work much harder also it would expand the market. I’d much rather have a tiny slice of a large pie, than the usual big piece of a tiny pie.’

Those comments differed with people he made last thirty days to Global Gaming Business. There, he said he ended up being still against ‘bad star’ clauses that will ban PokerStars from the marketplace entirely, but said that some penalties were appropriate.

‘ We must see the regulators saying because they were taking wagers illegally for those years, you are going to have to suffer a penalty where you can’t operate for a given period of time,’ Mattingley said that they can come in, but. ‘I think 2 yrs would make some sense…as competitors, I think we should be permitted to establish our brands, which could be done in 2 years.’

No Change in Opinion, States Mattingley

Those statements that are seemingly incompatible to have now been clarified in the Bluff interview. He said to Stutz was not included in the LVRJ article in it, Mattingley said that his position has been consistent all along, but that some of what.

According to Mattingley, his statements welcoming PokerStars back again to the US markets were followed by a qualifier that is big by which he said ‘…however, I do believe they got that top rated operating in an industry where everybody else had been out.’

‘They shouldn’t be allowed to walk into new states,’ Mattingley told Bluff. He offered up that an exclusion of one to 2 yrs is appropriate and reasonable to any or all ongoing parties, after which PokerStars should be permitted to compete like someone else.

Packer’s Crown Buys 36-Year Licensing Deal for $847 million

Pleased as punch: James Packer has secured a license that is 36-year the Crown Casino in Melbourne, plus tax concessions on high rollers. (Image: Justin Benson-Cooper/perthnow.com.au)

James Packer’s Crown Casino in Melbourne received a license extension until 2050 through the Government of the Australian state of Victoria, which has defended its decision to allow for the multi-decade add-on. The Victoria national will additionally allow Packer to expand table games and ‘pokie’ (slot) machines in Crown casinos, in return for re payments of up to A$910 million (US$847 million).

Politicians and anti-gambling teams have called the deal ‘grubby’ and ‘back-door,’ and declare that lacks transparency. But Victoria’s treasurer, Michael O’Brien, said that the contract would support investment that is economic jobs.

‘This contract provides significant benefits that are financial’ he said, ‘as well as improved competition and investment certainty for Crown and the 8,800 people who work here.’

Crown casino chairman Packer ended up being also fast to highlight the perceived economic benefits. He said that, while his business had invested $1.7 billion to upgrade the casino, ‘it had for the time that is long at ‘a major competitive drawback on the problem of taxation.

‘Now,’ he added, ‘with the support of the government that is victorian we will have a permit that enables us to compete for a level playing field to help drive tourism, jobs and economic benefit for the state.’

Anti-Gambling Backlash

Australian Churches Gambling Taskforce Chairman Rev. Tim Costello ended up being one of the most significant who spoke out from the deal, however.

‘ This whole thing smells,’ he said. ‘This close to lightning link slot grand jackpot an election, why would you are doing a deal without transparency, and with such haste, whenever it has major implications for the public that is victorian? Australia has 20 percent of all of the earth’s pokies, it has the population that is biggest of problem gamblers in the globe, and yet it has gone through without the debate or discussion.’

Five governments that are future he added, would be bound to the deal. ‘I think people now possesses world-weary cynicism about politicians, plus they know massive political contributions go to government from the gambling industry. They want fewer pokies, maybe not an increase or maintenance of current levels.’

Crown said it would expand the amount of pokie machines and gaming tables under the new deal, but the number of pokie device licenses would remain exactly the same, because it is absorbing existing licenses from pubs and clubs. Also, the Victoria government also agreed that a ‘super-tax’ will be removed on all high-rolling VIP players from next year.

Concessions to the Crown

This last point, stated O’ Brien, will allow Crown to compete with casinos in Macau and Singapore.

‘ This is a very competitive industry. We want to ensure that high rollers from overseas find an explanation to want to come calmly to Melbourne to spend their money,’ the treasurer noted.

However, Deakin University gambling researcher and expert Professor Linda Hancock questioned the logic behind this.

‘ I see no reason why the us government should be offering any concessions to Crown, it’s quite outrageous really,’ she said. ‘Crown has been systematically under-taxed for years. These sorts of concessions and deals should really be component of a election platform and shouldn’t happen brokered behind closed doors, but that is a characteristic of gambling policy. The government is really so beholden to the gambling industry, which is providing them this candy to fill government coffers for their election campaign.’

Despite negative publicity, the deal notably fortifies the place of Crown Resorts and this was reflected in the stock exchange. Shares in the company rose in the hours following the story originally broke.