Chauffer Suspect in Murder of Taiwanese Mogul Shih Chia-chin

Chauffer Suspect in Murder of Taiwanese Mogul Shih Chia-chin

Hsieh Yuan-hsin is the primary suspect in the kidnapping and murder of Shih Chia-chin. (Image: Taiwan police)

Taiwanese online gambling ringleader Shih Chia-chin may not be a home name in the online world betting community, but he was infamous in his home country for the wealth he attained by running their internet sites. Now, their murder and kidnapping have surprised the island country. Shih’s body was found Sunday evening in Tainan County by police. He was allegedly murdered after being kidnapped by his chauffeur and several others on August 18.

Chauffeur Abducted Shih at Airport

On that day, Shih was found at the airport that is taoyuan Taiwan by his chauffeur, Hsieh Yuan-hsin. Just three hours later on, the accountant at Shih’s company received a call saying that Shih had been demanding and kidnapped a ransom of TW$50 million ($1.67 million). Shih’s family attempted to negotiate with the kidnappers, eventually agreeing to wire TW$30 million ($1 million) to three bank that is separate.

When the family still did not hear from Shih, they contacted the police for assistance later that day. Hsieh apparently made a make an effort to withdraw the transferred ransom quickly thereafter, but fled when he was asked to provide identification during the bank.

Hsieh Flees to Thailand

Despite efforts from prosecutors whom issued a warrant to bar him from leaving the nation, Hsieh managed to board a flight to Thailand simply hours later utilizing a passport that is fake used his photo but his cousin’s name and details. Hsieh was spotted on airport CCTV footage on 18 august.

Based on the United Daily Information, police noted that Hsieh didn’t have a record that is criminal which made them suspect that another person may have planned the kidnapping. He did, but, seem to be covering his tracks, as he’d used his passport that is real to a journey to Hong Kong. The fake passport has been annulled, and Hsieh is suspected to nevertheless be in Thailand. Nonetheless, authorities fear he could flee to Cambodia or Myanmar, and Thai police have actually been expected to help in the investigation.

They also proposed that ransom might possibly not have been the primary motivation for the crime. Hsieh fled the nation without recovering the ransom, and a valuable watch was still on Shih’s body with regards to ended up being found.

In accordance with a report from the Central News Agency (CNA), a human anatomy was present in an area that is mountainous of County with over 20 puncture wounds to your back in the evening of August 24, about a week after the kidnapping took place. Shih’s family was called in to recognize the human anatomy, and confirmed that it was him.

Two Other Suspects in Custody

While Hsieh has not yet been apprehended, two other suspects were arrested on Monday. Complete names were not available, but The China Post said that their surnames were Lin and Cheng. According to authorities, Lin confessed to being fully a section of the kidnapping plot, but claimed that he did perhaps not know anything about plans to murder Shih. The two accomplices were identified surveillance that is using, which revealed they had abandoned Shih’s car in Greater Tainan.

Nine years ago, authorities cracked down on Shih’s Internet gambling ring. That resulted in an 18-month suspended prison term for the man whoever fortune was apparently worth billions of brand New Taiwan Dollars. Reports say that Shih had been the victim of the kidnapping attempt four years earlier.

PokerStars Should Wait to Enter US Markets, Says 888 CEO

888 CEO Brian Mattingley believes PokerStars must be allowed back into the US, but should face a short period that is exclusionary. (Image:

PokerStars and 888 Poker are natural rivals, as the companies are two of this biggest players in today’s online poker industry. PokerStars is by far the absolute most well-known Internet poker site in the world these days, which may be why 888 CEO Brian Mattingley has formerly said that permitting the poker that is amaya-owned straight back into the US would help all businesses, by attracting more players for everyone to share. But now, Mattingley has started to walk back those comments a bit, at the least in terms of permitting PokerStars entry that is free lucrative American states.

According to an interview between Mattingley and Bluff Magazine‘s Steve Ruddock, the 888 CEO still thinks that PokerStars would be advantageous to the overall American poker economy, and claims he welcomes their return. However, he does think they should get at least a slap on the wrist before they’re let back in that they gained an unfair advantage by continuing to service players in the US after the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) went into effect, and that as a result.

Statement Appears to Contradict Earlier Stance

June this is a little different from comments published by the Las Vegas Review-Journal (LVRJ) is. In an interview with that paper’s Howard Stutz, Mattingley ended up being quoted as stating that he desired to see PokerStars come back to the United States just as possible.

‘It will be like unleashing a 800-pound gorilla into the market, but having more players on a regulated site would benefit everyone,’ he said.

‘ We compete with PokerStars throughout Europe,’ Mattingley said of his rival that is largest. ‘They really are a solid competitor. But they would make all of us work much harder and it would expand the market. I would much go for a tiny slice of a large pie, than a big piece of a tiny cake.’

Those comments differed with people he made month that is last Global Gaming company. There, he said he had been still against ‘bad star’ clauses that would ban PokerStars from the market entirely, but said that some penalties were appropriate.

‘ We should see the regulators saying that they can come in, but because they certainly were taking wagers illegally for the people years, you will need to suffer a penalty where you can’t run for a provided time frame,’ Mattingley stated. ‘I think two years would make some sense…as competitors, I think we have to be allowed to establish our brands, which could be done in two years.’

No Change in Opinion, States Mattingley

Those seemingly incompatible statements seem to have now been clarified into the Bluff interview. He said to Stutz was not included in the LVRJ article in it, Mattingley said that his position has been consistent all along, but that some of what.

According to Mattingley, their statements welcoming PokerStars back once again to the US markets were followed closely by a qualifier that is big by which he said ‘…however, I actually do believe they got that leading edge operating in a market where everyone else was out.’

‘They really should not be allowed to walk into new states,’ Mattingley told Bluff. He offered up that an exclusion of just one to two years could be appropriate and reasonable to any or all parties, after which PokerStars should be permitted to compete like other people.

Packer’s Crown Buys 36-Year Licensing Deal for $847 million

Pleased as punch: James Packer has secured a 36-year license for the Crown Casino in Melbourne, plus tax concessions on high rollers. (Image: Justin Benson-Cooper/

James Packer’s Crown Casino in Melbourne received a license extension until 2050 from the Government of the Australian state of Victoria, which has defended its decision to allow for the multi-decade add-on. The Victoria national will allow Packer to also expand dining table games and ‘pokie’ (slot) machines in Crown casinos, in substitution for payments of up to A$910 million (US$847 million).

Politicians and anti-gambling groups have called the deal ‘grubby’ and ‘back-door,’ and claim that does not have transparency. But Victoria’s treasurer, Michael O’Brien, said that the contract would help economic investment and jobs.

‘This agreement provides significant financial advantages,’ he said, ‘as well as improved competitiveness and investment certainty for Crown and the 8,800 people who work there.’

Crown casino chairman Packer had been additionally fast to highlight the identified economic benefits. He said that, while his business had invested $1.7 billion to upgrade the casino, ‘it had for the very long time been at ‘a major competitive drawback on the issue of taxation.

‘Now,’ he added, ‘with the support of the Victorian government, we will have a license that enables us to compete for a level playing field to help drive tourism, jobs and economic advantage for the state.’

Anti-Gambling Backlash

Australian Churches Gambling Taskforce Chairman Rev. Tim Costello had been among the many who spoke out against the deal, nevertheless.

‘ This whole thing smells,’ he said. ‘This close to an election, why would you are doing a deal without transparency, and with such haste, when it has major implications for the Victorian public? Australia has 20 percent of the many earth’s pokies, it has the biggest population of problem gamblers in the globe, and yet it has gone through without any debate or discussion.’

Five future governments, he added, would be bound to your deal. ‘I think people now has a cynicism that is world-weary politicians, in addition they know massive political donations get to government from the gambling industry. They want fewer pokies, perhaps not an increase or maintenance of current levels.’

Crown said it would expand the quantity of pokie machines and video gaming tables beneath the deal that is new however the number of pokie device licenses would remain similar, because it could be absorbing existing licenses from pubs and clubs. Additionally, the Victoria government also agreed that a ‘super-tax’ will also be removed on all high-rolling VIP players from next year.

Concessions to the Crown

This point that is last stated O’ Brien, would allow Crown to compete with casinos in Macau and Singapore.

‘ This is a very competitive industry. We want to guarantee that high rollers from overseas find a reason to want to come calmly to Melbourne to spend their cash,’ the treasurer noted.

Nonetheless, Deakin University gambling specialist and researcher Professor Linda Hancock questioned the logic behind this.

‘ I see no good explanation why the government should be providing any concessions to Crown, it’s quite outrageous really,’ she said. ‘Crown has been systematically under-taxed for years. These sorts of concessions and deals must be component of a election platform and shouldn’t happen brokered in today’s world, but this is a characteristic of gambling policy. The federal government is really beholden to the gambling industry, which is providing them this candy to fill government coffers for their election campaign.’

The deal significantly fortifies the position of Crown Resorts and this was reflected in the stock market despite negative publicity. Stocks in the business rose in the hours following the story initially broke.